Soccer Pac-12: Ranking the 2022 schedule; Easiest UCLA in conference

01 Jun 2022 | 08:29

Pac-12 last week announced two additional components to its 2022 soccer schedule, revealing the start times for early-season games and the final lineup of weeknight games.

For the purposes of this exercise, the following two revelations make more sense: No assessment of schedule strength is complete without taking into account the logistics of Thursday’s and Friday’s games.

Overall, the Pac-12 has 11 dates with Power Five competitors, including Notre Dame (three games), Georgia, Florida and Michigan State.

The three teams will not play any conference air games.

The two teams met no Power Five opponents.

One team doesn’t leave home until October.

Next up, with schedules ranked from hardest to hardest…

1. Colorado

Home games (six): TCU (Friday), UCLA, Cal, Arizona State, Oregon, Utah

Road games (six): Air Force, Minnesota, Arizona, Oregon State, USC (Friday), Washington

Pac-12 misses: Stanford and Washington State

Notable Nuggets: Buff faces Oregon, USC, Washington and Utah in a row in November. Oops.

Comment: Every aspect of CU’s schedule feels like a Category 5 storm, from the absence of non-conference cupcakes to crossover division misses to the brutal closing stages. All of this for a team that will seem to struggle with an average schedule.

2. Stanford

Home games (six): Colgate, BYU, USC, Oregon State, Arizona State, Washington State

Road games (six): Notre Dame Cathedral, Oregon, Washington, Utah, Cal, UCLA

Pac-12 misses: Arizona and Colorado

Notable Nuggets: Stanford was the only team to have a goodbye period in September (Week Three), which forced Cardinal to compete for 10 consecutive weeks. Good luck with that.

Comment: We considered placing this lineup at #1, but at least Cardinal has a cupcake (Colgate). The route schedule is very difficult (usually occurs in even years).

3. Oregon

Home games (six): BYU, East Washington, Stanford, UCLA, Washington, Utah

Long/neutral road games (six): Georgia (neutral), Washington State, Arizona, Cal, Colorado, Oregon State

Pac-12 misses: USC and ASUS

Notable Nuggets: The Washington game (November 12) will be played into the season later than in any year since 2002 (November 16).

Comment: Our assessment of the schedule starts with the opening game against the defending champions, but all of Oregon’s losses to Stanford and derailment in the desert increase the difficulty level.

4. Arizona

Family games (seven): Mississippi State, North Dakota State, Colorado, USC, Oregon, WSU, ASU (Friday)

Road Games (five): San Diego State, Cal, Washington, Utah, UCLA

Pac-12 misses: Stanford and the State of Oregon

Notable Nuggets: The NDSU has won nine of the past 11 FCS national titles. Think of it as a toss game.

Comment: This is Arizona’s toughest schedule in years with missed cross-sections wrong and no cupcakes outside of the conference. (Then again, after last season, can anyone be considered a cupcake for the Cats?)

5. Utah

Home games (six): Southern Utah, San Diego State, Oregon State, USC, Arizona, Stanford

Road games (six): Florida, Arizona, UCLA, Washington State (Thursday), Oregon, Colorado

Pac-12 misses: Washington and Cal

Notable Nuggets: The WSU game (October 27) will be the Pac-12’s first conference game on Thursday since Stanford-UCLA during the 2019 season.

Comment: The schedule is perfect for a playoff contender, with just enough challenges to please the selection panel but no nasty slurs and a game of revenge (SDSU) in what could be one situation. trap. By the way, the Utes are the 1.5-point favorite in Florida.

6. State of Arizona

Home games (six): NAU (Thursday), Eastern Michigan, Utah, Washington, UCLA, Oregon

Road games (six): Oklahoma State, Colorado, Stanford, Washington State, USC, Arizona (Friday)

Pac-12 misses: Cal and Oregon

Notable Nuggets: ASU are the only team to play four of the last six games on the road.

Comment: Circumstances made the schedule more difficult than initially imagined: The Sun Devils and their rebuilt roster have three days of early play against the top teams (Oklahoma State, Utah and USC) 15 of the AP pre-season poll.

7. Washington State

Family games (seven): Idaho, Colorado, Oregon, Cal, Utah (Thursday), Arizona, Washington

Road Games (five): Wisconsin, USC, Oregon State, Stanford, Arizona

Pac-12 misses: UCLA and Colorado

Notable Nuggets: The Cougars are the only team to open with two consecutive home games.

Comment: Nice to see a Power Five rival on the schedule (first since 2015), but it’s a manageable lineup overall, especially with OSU, Stanford and Arizona taking up 75% of the schedule. conference.

8. Oregon State

Family games (seven): Boise State, Montana State, USC, Washington State, Colorado, Cal, Oregon

Road Games (five): Fresno State, Utah, Stanford, Washington (Friday), Arizona State

Pac-12 misses: UCLA and Arizona

Notable Nuggets: The Beavers haven’t won their season opener since beating Weber State in 2015.

Comment: Boise State isn’t as tough as it used to be, but Fresno State will be a significant challenge in the Central Valley’s September heat. Add USC and Utah to the early-season schedule, and there’s no room for a slow start to a show that’s been slow to start.

9. Cal

Family games (seven): UC Davis, UNLV, Arizona, Washington, Oregon, Stanford, UCLA (Friday)

Road Games (five): Notre Dame Cathedral, Washington State, Colorado, USC, Oregon State

Pac-12 misses: Utah and ASUS

Notable Nuggets: The bears face Notre Dame for the first time since 1967 and have not scored more than eight points against Ireland in any of the previous four meetings.

Comment: Combine two non-conference cupcakes with a favorable lineup of conference house games and a major departmental miss and this schedule will help propel the period forward. after the season.

10. USC

Family games (seven): Rice, Fresno State, Notre Dame, Arizona State, Washington State, Cal, Colorado (Friday)

Road Games (five): Stanford, Oregon State, Utah, Arizona, UCLA

Pac-12 misses: Oregon and Washington

Remarkable: USC, UCLA and Washington are the only teams to play all three games not at home.

Comment: An almost perfect schedule to start the Lincoln Riley era. We wouldn’t call the lineup easy, but the order and placement (e.g. no head-to-head lane games) create a potential launchpad for USC to return to relevance.

11. Washington

Family games (seven): Kent State, Portland State, Michigan State, Stanford, Arizona, Oregon State (Friday), Colorado

Road Games (five): UCLA (Friday), Arizona State, Cal, Oregon, Washington State

Pac-12 misses: USC and Utah

Notable Nuggets: Washington doesn’t play his first road game until October 1 (at UCLA)

Comment: Sure, Michigan State poses a first-class challenge, and the conference’s track line-up is tough and features two games on Friday. But the key point for us to evaluate the UW schedule is the absence of USC and Utah. Kalen DeBoer couldn’t ask for more.

12. UCLA

Home games (eight): Bowling Green, Alabama, South Alabama, Washington (Friday), Utah, Stanford, Arizona, USC

Road games (four): Colorado, Oregon, Arizona State, Cal (Friday)

Pac-12 misses: Oregon State and Washington State

Notable Nuggets: UCLA was scheduled to visit Michigan in the fall, but the Wolverines canceled the home and family series — and reportedly paid the Bruins $1.5 million to void the contract.

Comment: With three non-conference cupcakes and eight home games, including USC and Utah, the schedule will allow Chip Kelly to build on his 2021 momentum.

*** Previous content about the 2022 season:

Our updated top 25 rankingsSelection for division racesOdds for Heisman TrophyQuadrant Depth RatingOdds to win conference titleTotal wins for each team

Support Hotline: Get three months of unlimited access for just 99 cents. Yep, that’s 99 cents for 90 days, with the option to cancel anytime. Details hereand thanks for your support.

*** Send suggestions, comments, and tips (confidentiality guaranteed) to or call 408-920-5716

*** Follow me on twitter: @WilnerHotline

*** The Pac-12 Hotline is not endorsed or sponsored by the Pac-12 Conference and the views expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the Conference.